Advisor Website Home | Contact Us | Site Map | Help | Career Opportunities

Federal budget cuts: Impact and implications

Speaker:
Darrell Spence
Title:
Economist
Based in:
Los Angeles
Investment experience:
21

DARRELL SPENCE: The sequester itself — the headline dollar amount of $85 billion [of the ultimate $1.2 trillion total] — is about 0.6% of GDP. However, not all of that is likely to actually be implemented in the current year. The payroll tax hike that occurred at the beginning of the year was about another $100–105 billion, so about 0.7% of GDP. So you can see how, when you start to add these things up, you’re starting to exert a reasonable drag on U.S. economic activity.

The good news is that the private sector seems to be doing pretty well. The housing market is recovering, and you have very strong construction activity going on; nonresidential construction is starting to do the same thing. Big-ticket purchases like autos have been increasing for a number of years now. Businesses are starting to invest, because they have reasonable profit growth and high profit margins and rising utilization rates.

So there’s a whole host of other things that are going on within the U.S. economy that can offset the drag that’s coming from fiscal policy. And when you start to add up all of the dollars, net-net, that keeps the economy growing — granted, perhaps not as fast as we’ve become accustomed to, particularly coming out of difficult economic periods. But I don’t think the sequester is enough to drag the economy down into a recession, given all of the other things that are going on in the private sector that are much more positive.

I think the Federal Reserve views the sequester as yet another drag on growth. They’ve made it very clear that they are unlikely to change the stance of their policy until they find a good reason to do so, and that good reason is going to be a better growth outlook. They pretty much explicitly laid out that they won’t start to raise interest rates until the unemployment rate gets down closer to 6.5%. Now, there are other ways that they could start to remove accommodation, or even tighten policy, that have to do with the balance sheet measures and all of the assets that they’ve purchased. But again, I think their comments have been pretty clear: They don’t view the economy as growing strongly enough to start removing some of that accommodation. And they’re going to view the sequester as just yet another reason to keep the accommodation in place.


Past results are not predictive of results in future periods.

Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.

Investing outside the U.S. involves additional risks, such as currency fluctuations, periods of illiquidity and price volatility, as more fully described in the prospectus. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in developing countries.

Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed-income investment professionals provide fixed-income research and investment management across the Capital organization; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.

Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.

The statements included here are the opinions and beliefs of the speaker(s) expressed at the time thecommentary was recorded and are not intended to represent those persons' opinions and beliefs at any other time.